Bitcoin (BTC) Rating = 257/1,000 = 25.7%
Technology (0 to 300) = 22
- Speed (0 to 50) = 1
With 5 to 7 transactions per second, transactions speeds of 20 mins up to a few days and with regular backlogs of 50,000 stuck transactions, Bitcoin is one of the worst performers in the entire cryptocurrency industry.
- Cost (0 to 50) = 1
The cost of a transaction is one of the most expensive in all of blockchain with costs rising parabolically depending on network congestion.
- Scalability (0 to 50) = 5
The Bitcoin network itself is completely unscalable. External off chain solutions like the Lightning Network are not Bitcoin specific and as yet do not really work at all.
- Reliability (0 to 50) = 5
Regular instability, network congestion as well as occasional days long delays and astronomical fees make the network decidedly unreliable.
- Environmental Impact (0 to 50) = 0
Bitcoin is an unmitigated disaster. No matter how the Bitcoin Maxis try and spin it, the physical waste of mining rigs and the horrendous electricity wastes make BTC completely unfeasible and a toxic plague for our planet.
- Decentralisation (0 to 50) = 10
The Bitcoin network is controlled by a small few with Binance and a couple of Chinese mining pools recently publicly admitting they can “reorganise” the network at will. The size and impact of such a reorg would devastate BTC so they score 10 points for decentralisation only because we are probably still a couple of years away from such a major attack, though when China says go there’s nothing anyone can do to protect Bitcoin.
Security (-250 to 0) = -110
- Reorg, 51% & Brute Force Attack (-100 to 0) = -80
With China controlling Bitcoin there is a very real risk of attack.
- Potential For Being Banned (-100 to 0) = -20
Governments and regulators are likely to target privacy coins first but due to the huge environmental impact of Proof of Work coins like Bitcoin are in danger.
- Network Vulnerabilities (-50 to 0) = -10
Bitcoin is the oldest and largest cryptocurrency and as such there are enough groups with vested interests to keep the network secure for the moment.
Use Case (0 to 500) = 280
- Initial Main Use Case (0 to 100) = 30
Bitcoin was dreamt up as an electronic peer to peer currency. This has proven not to be feasible due to the poor technology, however enough people still believe in the value to keep this use case going.
- Mainnet Live (0 to 200) = 200
Full marks for having a working product live for many years now.
- Additional Use Cases (0 to 100) = 30
The “Store of Value” narrative is the new selling point. Bitcoin also has first to market advantage meaning most exchanges still use it as a base trading pair.
- Additional Working Products (0 to 100) = 20
We’ll be generous and award 10 points for the Lightning Network and 10 points for BitPay.
Core Team, Partnerships & Developers (0 to 200) = 65
- Core Team & Developers (0 to 100) = 25
Most of the initial developers have moved on to other things but due to the price and overall value, enough mining pools are vested enough to keep this thing trudging along.
- Partnerships (0 to 100) = 40
Giant financial corporations like Bakkt, Fidelity, Coinbase and Binance as well as some general companies are vested enough into Bitcoin to make sure the illusion of real world use carries on for now.
Visit the following page for an overview of all the Wise Crypto Ratings.